Lake Mead Fishfinders
Open navigation

Explainer · Sonar Imaging

Side Imaging vs Down Imaging: What They Actually Do

An honest, plain-English comparison of side imaging and down imaging — when each one matters, when both are overkill, and how to read both.

Both views are sonar — same physics, different orientation. Side imaging fires sonar pulses out to either side of the boat and plots returns horizontally. Down imaging fires straight down and plots a thin photographic-looking slice of the water column underneath. They show different things and they earn their keep differently.

What side imaging is best at

  • Finding offshore structure without driving over it. See the brushpile 70 ft to your starboard, mark a waypoint, keep moving.
  • Identifying fish on cover. Bass holding next to a stump or rockpile show up as bright pixels with the structure's shadow visible behind.
  • Mapping a new area fast. One pass across an offshore flat with side imaging covers more visual ground than ten passes with traditional sonar.

What down imaging is best at

  • Reading individual structure under the boat. Branches show as branches, trunks as trunks. You can see the shape of the brushpile.
  • Separating fish from cover. Bass tucked tight to the bottom that 2D sonar paints into a single mark, down imaging separates out as a clear bright dot above the dark structure.
  • Reading bottom transitions. Sand to gravel to rock — these transitions are very clear on down imaging.
Side imaging vs down imaging — which earns each call?
FeatureSide ImagingHorizontal scanDown ImagingVertical slice
Searching open water
Inspecting individual structure
Mapping new water fast
Vertical fishing (drop-shot, jigging)
Reading bottom hardness
Useful at idle to 5 mph
Useful at 0 mph (hovering)
Required transducerSI-capableDI-capable

Which one do you actually need?

On a bass boat in 2026: both. Every modern unit at the mid-tier and above includes both transducer modes in a single package (Garmin GT54, Lowrance Active Imaging, Humminbird MEGA SI/DI). You're not really choosing.

On a kayak or a budget aluminum: down imaging is the stronger first investment. You move slowly, your useful search radius is small, and the under-the-boat detail of down imaging is what you'll actually use. Side imaging is a nice-to-have at this level.

For deeper-water vertical fishing (Lake Mead striper jigging, Lake Powell smallmouth on rockpiles), down imaging is more useful than side imaging — you're fishing what's under the boat, not what's 80 ft to the side.

How to read both

Both views are covered in detail in our complete how-to-read-a-fish-finder tutorial. The two-line summary: on side imaging, distance from the centre line is real-world distance from the boat — and structure casts shadows. On down imaging, the screen is a thin slice of the water column right under the boat — branches look like branches, fish look like dots.

Frequently asked questions

Can a fish finder show both at once?

Yes. Most modern units let you split the screen into 2D + side imaging + down imaging simultaneously. The trade-off is that each view gets less screen real estate. Larger displays (9 inches and up) handle the multi-view layout much better.

Do I need a high-frequency transducer?

Imaging modes typically run 455 kHz, 800 kHz or 1.2 MHz (Humminbird MEGA). Higher frequency = more detail but less depth. Most stock transducers on $500+ units already support the right frequencies for both side and down imaging.

Why does my side imaging look fuzzy?

Three common reasons: (1) you're going too fast — side imaging works at idle to 5 mph; (2) the transducer mounting is poor; (3) the range is set too wide for the depth you're fishing. Try halving the range setting first.

Keep reading

Related from the magazine